Re: [boost] Range-aware version of min and max

Subject: Re: [boost] Range-aware version of min and max
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-28 09:37:33

At Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:36:32 -0600,
Zachary Turner wrote:
> 
> is_less_comparable should be
> needed in order to determine if min is even a valid operation, and
> is_greater_comparable would be needed to determine if max is a valid
> operation, right?

is_less_comparable would suffice for both unless you have a very unusual
definition of min and max.

-- 
Dave Abrahams           Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com