Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation - was C++ Networking Library Release 0.5

Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation - was C++ Networking Library Release 0.5
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-31 07:06:11

On 01/31/2010 02:56 PM, Thomas Klimpel wrote:

> Wasn't there a "rejected proposal for" logo? I guess it was dropped
> for the same reason that "under construction for" was renamed to
> "under construction". How about "in preparation for" and "rejected
> by"? These would at least make a statement about the relation to
> boost.

IMHO, the "rejected" logo makes a disservice for the library, as it 
marks it as something of inappropriate quality for Boost in eyes of 
users. Therefore I'd like it to be rephrased to something more neutral, 
such as "unofficial extension" or something of that kind.