Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation - was C++ Networking Library Release 0.5
From: Bjørn Roald (bjorn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-02 15:06:45
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 07:36:42 pm Patrick Horgan wrote:
> My position on this, is that your quickbook generated doc for
> not-yet-on-review-queue software could link to POWERED BY icon iff your
> software uses other libraries, but that otherwise it would be premature
> to claim any association with boost.
Fair - but then there need to be a firm understanding of when a library is
associated with boost. I am not sure that understanding exist.
> That's what started this whole
> discussion on another thread, the use of a boost logo for something that
> was on review bothered some.
Yes, But it probably bothers developers that there are no firm guide of how to
deal with this. The templates for new documentation has the official logo.
They use it as advised, and then people get annoyed. If they don't use it
people also get annoyed.
> The use of a PROPOSED FOR icon for
> something not on the review queue or any other icon other than the
> POWERED BY (if appropriate) would also bother some.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk