Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Formal review request: static size matrix/vector linear algebra library (Boost) LA
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-02 16:35:08


On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Thomas Klimpel
<Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> Documentation and source code complete with comprehensive tests,
>> released under the Boost Software License is available here:
>>
>> http://www.revergestudios.com/boost-la/
>
> Can you tell what has changed since http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2009/10/157156.php ? Is it worth for me to review it again, or did you just posted this because of the "linear algebra library... again" message from DE? (Just curious, I don't want to imply that your initial submission wasn't sufficient for a formal review request.)

The difference is that this is a formal review request as per the
Boost submission process.

Nothing has changed because nobody pointed out anything that needed to
be changed in the preliminary review. There are a few concerns, like
the use of operator| ("pipe") to implement type-safe casting but I am
not aware of a better solution.

Emil Dotchevski
Reverge Studios, Inc.
http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk