Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial orunreleased boost documentation
From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-04 18:08:26
On 4 February 2010 22:02, Nelson, Erik - 2
> I'm not sure if my experience is typical, but I've seen a number of
> projects that used the boost logo because the developers had aspirations
> to be included in a boost release. I never had much trouble telling
> what was "official" boost, though... if it was in the release off the
> boost website, I concluded it was boost... otherwise, not.
It might be better to start something separate, to bring together
anything which follows the STL/Boost style. There's no need for it to
be officially blessed or as formal as Boost, just a good way to find
C++ libraries that will hopefully work well together.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk