Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [Serialization] Trac #3604
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-05 12:16:13


As you know I did spend time looking at this. I was convinced it was a
limitation
of the system and closed the ticket. You've reopened it including a lot of
new
information. I haven't been able to spend the time on it I believe that it
deserves
so there it is. Given the effort you've expended - including a good test -
means
that I WILL look at it. I just can't promise when.

Robert Ramey

Takatoshi Kondo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Will trac #3604 patch be merged in next release?
> https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/attachment/ticket/3604/ticket3064_remove_const.patch
>
> This patch solves the recursive_register order problem.
> The recursive_register order problem means below.
>
> When the new void_caster_shortcut is made from
> a void_caster_registry member and a current candidate,
>
> If the void_caster_registry member includes virtual base and
> the current candidate doesn't include it, the information
> includes_virtual_base is lost.
>
> This patch fixes such problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Takatoshi Kondo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk