Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in Remote Procedure Call Library?
From: Stephan Menzel (stephan.menzel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-08 09:18:02

Next message: Paul A. Bristow: "[boost] Proposal for new variants of the Boost logo."
Previous message: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation"
In reply to: Daniel Larimer: "Re: [boost] Interest in Remote Procedure Call Library?"
Next in thread: Rutger ter Borg: "Re: [boost] Interest in Remote Procedure Call Library?"

Daniel,

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Daniel Larimer <dlarimer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Do you mean that multiple languages should support the RPC protocol? Does LabView count?
> We currently have an embedded (C) version and a labview one.

I'm not sure I understand correctly. My point is: you should be able
to offer RPC services in more than one language. And you should be
able to call them (possibly natively) in multiple languages. That's
all ;-)

Cheers,
Stephan

Next message: Paul A. Bristow: "[boost] Proposal for new variants of the Boost logo."
Previous message: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation"
In reply to: Daniel Larimer: "Re: [boost] Interest in Remote Procedure Call Library?"
Next in thread: Rutger ter Borg: "Re: [boost] Interest in Remote Procedure Call Library?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk