Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in Remote Procedure Call Library?
From: Stephan Menzel (stephan.menzel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-08 09:18:02
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Daniel Larimer <dlarimer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Do you mean that multiple languages should support the RPC protocol? Does LabView count?
> We currently have an embedded (C) version and a labview one.
I'm not sure I understand correctly. My point is: you should be able
to offer RPC services in more than one language. And you should be
able to call them (possibly natively) in multiple languages. That's
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk