Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal for new variants of the Boost logo.
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-08 12:10:02
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On
> John Maddock
> Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 4:30 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal for new variants of the Boost logo.
> > To see the proposed logos:
> > http://dbp-consulting.com/boostvariantslogo.html
> > (produced by Patrick Hogan).
> I like the "powered by" logos very much, the others I'm not so sure of.
> Personally I think proposed/sandbox libraries could use the "powered by"
> logo too?
They could - but then it goes without saying that *all* potential submissions
will be "powered by" existing Boost libraries?
The "For use with" is intended to indicate that this is a potential Boost
library under development, but clearly showing it's not yet reviewed and
accepted. The original issue was that stuff under development is using the
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk