Re: [boost] Proposal for new variants of the Boost logo.

Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal for new variants of the Boost logo.
From: Jeffrey Bosboom (jbosboom_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-08 22:27:28

Jeffrey Bosboom wrote:
 > Paul A. Bristow wrote:
 >> PS Some were also in favour of a "Proposed for Boost"  logo to be used
 >> only *for
 >> libraries in the review queue*,
 >> but not yet in a final release. Others felt this was unnecessary.  So
 >> unless
 >> there is strong support for this, it does not form part of this 
proposal.
 >
 > Not only is it necessary, it makes it easy for users of the logo to do
 > the right thing, by not removing the logo when they leave the review
 > queue.  Also, with the recent pace of the review queue being as it is,
 > this risks becoming a semi-permanent status, and I'd prefer not to
 > advertise that.

s/necessary/unnecessary/
s/right/wrong/

Sorry for having to send a second correction e-mail; I will proofread 
more carefully next time.  After all, the list isn't going anywhere 
while I type and read.

--Jeffrey Bosboom