Re: [boost] Proposal for new variants of the Boost logo.

Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal for new variants of the Boost logo.
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-09 08:43:34

Jeffrey Bosboom wrote:
> Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> >
> > 1  For projects that are written with Boost 'in mind',
> > perhaps for submission,
> > but are *not yet reviewed and accepted*.
> >
> >   "For use with"  - logo for projects having some
> >   association with Boost, but are *not 'official'*.
> >
> > (Many like red text to signal strongly that this is NOT
> > (perhaps yet) a Boost approved library).
>
> I don't think this is self-descriptive enough.  For example, GIL is a
> Boost library, and GIL extensions are obviously "for use with" Boost.
> But I don't think "for use with" implies "not officially part
> of" Boost.

"For use with" is quite clear to me as not being part of but compatible with something.

_____
Rob Stewart                           robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software      using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  http://www.sig.com

IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.