Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in Remote Procedure Call Library?
From: strasser_at_[hidden]
Date: 2010-02-11 05:16:26

Next message: Rutger ter Borg: "Re: [boost] Interest in Remote Procedure Call Library?"
Previous message: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] Proposal for new variants of the Boost logo."
In reply to: Daniel Larimer: "[boost] Interest in Remote Procedure Call Library?"

Zitat von Daniel Larimer <dlarimer_at_[hidden]>:

> I have been playing with some code and recently developed a very
> efficient, extensible, and easy to use API for performing remote
> procedure calls (with multiple protocols).

I don't have much time to participate in this discussion right now,
but I still wanted to express my interest in such a library. In
particular, for this purpose:

https://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/persistent/libs/persistent/doc/html/persistent/future.html#persistent.future.remote_resource_manager

(Remote resource manager)

Regards,

Next message: Rutger ter Borg: "Re: [boost] Interest in Remote Procedure Call Library?"
Previous message: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] Proposal for new variants of the Boost logo."
In reply to: Daniel Larimer: "[boost] Interest in Remote Procedure Call Library?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk