Re: [boost] C++0x and MSVC 10

Subject: Re: [boost] C++0x and MSVC 10
From: Zachary Turner (divisortheory_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-16 01:02:03

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Daniel James <daniel_james_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> On 15 February 2010 23:40, vicente.botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > If there is a plan to remove the deprecated froms soon, I agree. When the
> deprecated forms will be removed?
>
> Before we can consider removing the old macros, we have to update all
> the places where they're used in boost.

 The entire list of macros that need to be deprecated should be as follows.
 Someone correct me if I'm wrong, it was a little tricky finding all of
these.

BOOST_HAS_DECLTYPE   [proto]
BOOST_HAS_RVALUE_REFERENCES   [interprocess, smart_ptr, thread, unordered]
BOOST_HAS_STATIC_ASSERT   [static_assert]
BOOST_HAS_CONCEPTS     [xpressive]
BOOST_HAS_VARIADIC_TMPL   [smart_ptr, unordered, interprocess, proto]

Many more _HAS_ macros are defined in the various compiler config files but
never referenced.  Obviously those should be eliminated too.