Subject: Re: [boost] [transact] code in sandbox
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-17 10:13:54
> Zitat von "Stewart, Robert" <Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden]>:
> > Couldn't you avoid the inner try block by detecting a pending
> > exception in ~commit_on_destruction()?
> because of how std::uncaught_exception() works that would
> fail if the
> macros are used inside a destructor that is called during exception
I'm familiar with that issue, but I never imagined that would be a reasonable use case. Would you want to encourage using such code in a destructor by this design choice?
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk