Re: [boost] virtual function templates

Subject: Re: [boost] virtual function templates
From: Bob Walters (bob.s.walters_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-23 17:30:30

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:09 AM,  <strasser_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there interest in a boost utility to implement (pseudo-) virtual function
> templates?

I've been looking for a way to implement virtual-functions for cases where the
objects in question are stored within shared memory region, thus presenting the
challenge that the overridden function addresses might be different
for different
processes.

Would that be accommodated by your approach, or are you in fact storing
pointers to functions on the base type?