Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] improvements/proposals
From: Domagoj Saric (dsaritz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-27 05:25:48

"Rutger ter Borg" <rutger_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Given a number of articles on the web titled "Fast Delegates for C++" or
> similar, and how they're supposed to be better and faster than
> Boost.Function, I am curious if you were able to make progress on this
> matter?

Yes ;) briefly outlined in the first post of this thread ( ) ...
there you can also find links to previous threads that discussed the issues in
(much) greater detail...

I have also found various 'fast delegates'-type of articles (if memory serves
me right I've posted a link to one in one of my first posts on this subject)
but did not yet seriously go through them as the changes I made were already so
numerous that it seemed it would be better if we first discuss the changes so
far before proceeding further...
...unfortunately I am still waiting for a response from Dogulas Gregor (he said
he is currently swamped with his 'real job')...

"What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual 
devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than from 
one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate."
Neil Postman 

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at