Subject: Re: [boost] [rfc] rcpp
From: Ivan Sorokin (sorokin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-28 03:50:38
Daniel Trebbien wrote:
>> I have a small library that is intended for convenient and declarative
>> resource wrappers creation.
>> Read Documentation:
>> Main Page:
> What is the safe_bool stuff for; or, why have you implemented
> `operator sb_type() const` rather than `operator bool() const` for
> evaluating a `resource` as a `bool`?
T a, b;
a + b; // correct (convert to bool and add)
a * b; // as well
a / b;
a < b;
I want to have possibility to write objects of my class under if and
while, but without addition, multiplication, etc
So instead of operator bool I use operator to member-function.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk