Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Log formal review upcoming
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-02 13:32:30
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> For binary-related sinks there is no such requirement, and the term
> "consume" describes the process best. In your case, consuming may well
> involve Boost.Serialization, there are no changes in Boost.Log
> required to achieve that. Note however, that AFAIK, Boost.Serialization
> not have a tool for portable binary serialization ...
The package includes demo_portable_archive includes such a tool.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk