Re: [boost] Boost.Log formal review upcoming

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Log formal review upcoming
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-02 17:18:18

Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On 02.03.2010 21:32, Robert Ramey wrote:
>> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>>
>>> For binary-related sinks there is no such requirement, and the term
>>> "consume" describes the process best. In your case, consuming may
>>> well involve Boost.Serialization, there are no changes in Boost.Log
>>> required to achieve that. Note however, that AFAIK,
>>> Boost.Serialization does
>>> not have a tool for portable binary serialization ...
>>
>> The package includes demo_portable_archive includes such a tool.
>
> Last time I checked it didn't support FP types. Has that changed?

No

> Also, are there other limitations?

The current version in only builds and links with static version of
the boost serialization library.  If this were more than a demo that
could addressed.

> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost