Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Boost.Log formal review
From: Barend Gehrels (barend_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-12 05:44:47
> Barend Gehrels wrote:
>> However, what might happen is that if there is an attractive logging
>> library, Boost library writers start to use it, of course. All libraries
> Why would they? I'd say logging is done by an application, not by
> generic libraries.
Because logging is also useful in libraries, and there is no Boost
Police preventing this being done in existing libraries.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk