Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] boost::log review (printf style api)
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-15 07:16:40

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [Boost.Locale] New Release"
Previous message: Thomas Klimpel: "[boost] [iterator] Help needed understanding output_iterator requirements"
In reply to: Tom Brinkman: "[boost] boost::log review (printf style api)"
Next in thread: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] boost::log review (printf style api)"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Tom Brinkman
> Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 10:59 PM
> To: Boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] boost::log review (printf style api)

> Failure to include a "printf" style api will only continue to marginalize
> boost further to
> small subset of c++ developers. Most developers will look at the api without
> a printf and go, HUH?

Others may go "UGH!" ... So last millennium ... ;-)

Paul

---
Paul A. Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse
Kendal, UK   LA8 8AB
+44 1539 561830, mobile +44 7714330204
pbristow_at_[hidden]

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [Boost.Locale] New Release"
Previous message: Thomas Klimpel: "[boost] [iterator] Help needed understanding output_iterator requirements"
In reply to: Tom Brinkman: "[boost] boost::log review (printf style api)"
Next in thread: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] boost::log review (printf style api)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk