Subject: Re: [boost] static in_class constants
From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-15 11:06:54
> I have question of different nature, why the names are
> prefixed with underscore? Does it denote they are private,
> as implementation detail, shouldn't be used as part of public
> interface, any other purpose?
It's my coding style to have members ( public, protected, private )
marked with an underscore. I believe it enhances readability. But that
might be just me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk