Re: [boost] static in_class constants

Subject: Re: [boost] static in_class constants
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-15 14:14:14

Christian Henning wrote:
> Hi Mateusz,
> 
>> I don't comment them if I like or not as this belongs to coding
>> style which is a subjective matter :-)
>> However, I'd be careful with underscore prefix, in general, regarding to
>> C++/17.4.3.1.2. I noticed that inclusion guards in IO 2use reserved
>> names startign with underscore followed by uppercase.
> 
> What's IO 2use?

I'm sorry Christian, I meant the new GIL I/O version 2
I shortly called IO 2.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net