Subject: Re: [boost] [unordered] unordered_set::erase() complexity bug?
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-15 17:41:05
On 15 March 2010 21:24, Howard Hinnant <howard.hinnant_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Ah! Excellent point. If I'm missing your point just let me know. But the way to handle this is to have your custom deleter make its node_pointer type the same as the node_allocator's node_pointer type. unique_ptr will then use it for the storage.
OK, I thought I might be missing something, I didn't know that
unique_ptr supported custom pointer types. Looks like Ion already
supports it so it should be pretty easy to do.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk