Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Comments
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-16 11:17:19
On Tuesday 16 March 2010 18:00:10 Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On 03/16/2010 08:50 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 March 2010 01:34:52 Andrey Semashev wrote:
> >> In my view, the filter should be replaced on update. You can have the
> >> map of components or whatever, and the filter pointing to them. On
> >> update you create a new map and a new filter, and set it to the
> >> core/sinks. No additional locking required, no special syntax,
> >> everything's safe and clean. Same goes for formatters.
> > What about performance? If I have 100 components, copying map on
> > each update seems not too good. Locking is probably better.
> It's you use case, and you probably know better. But I seriously doubt
> that locking the filter on each log record (which, I assume, is rather
> often) can be better than filling a 100-element container on occasional
> config updates.
In either case, this is more like implementation choice than interface
one, so we don't need to come with any decision right now.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk