Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Boost.Log formal review closing down
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-17 17:33:42

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrey Semashev" <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Boost.Log formal review closing down

> On 03/17/2010 05:52 PM, Steven Watanabe wrote:
>> vicente.botet wrote:
>>> * Severity: I would like that any sink filters thie severity the
>>> log_record is not added at all. Could this optimization be taken in
>>> account. For example if severity must be GT error to be logged, the
>>> following will not evaluate the ineficient_function().
>>> BOOST_LOG_SEV(slg, normal) << ineficient_function();
>> I'm pretty sure that if no sink is going to accept the
>> record, then inefficient_function will indeed not
>> be called.
> I confirm.

Yes I see, but the log record will be build with all its attributes which will take more time than just checking for severity.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at