Subject: Re: [boost] [unordered] unordered_set::erase() complexity bug?
From: Christopher Crickmar (cjcrickmar_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-18 05:54:24
Given that the next iterator is meaningless for an unordered container and
that cached_begin_bucket_ is always valid would it be bad manners to always
return begin() ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk