Re: [boost] [log] Boost.Log formal review closing down

Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Boost.Log formal review closing down
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-18 13:33:46

On 03/18/2010 01:07 AM, vicente.botet wrote:
>>> My proposal was multiple to respond to the needs of other users. From my side it is enough to identify an attribute using a tag. What is wrong using tags?
>>
>> I think, using tags as keys in the attribute set is less natural than
>> strings or any other runtime object for that matter.
>
> Note that tags are static. So no runtime penality.

If you're after a fully static logging library, the proposed library 
does not suit you. There was a discussion on that topic during the review.

> Could you answer my question, What is the value of "ProcessId"?

It's an integral process identifier. The result of getpid on UNIX and 
GetCurrentProcessId on Windows.