Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Boost.Log formal review closing down
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-18 13:33:46


On 03/18/2010 01:07 AM, vicente.botet wrote:
>>> My proposal was multiple to respond to the needs of other users. From my side it is enough to identify an attribute using a tag. What is wrong using tags?
>>
>> I think, using tags as keys in the attribute set is less natural than
>> strings or any other runtime object for that matter.
>
> Note that tags are static. So no runtime penality.

If you're after a fully static logging library, the proposed library
does not suit you. There was a discussion on that topic during the review.

> Could you answer my question, What is the value of "ProcessId"?

It's an integral process identifier. The result of getpid on UNIX and
GetCurrentProcessId on Windows.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk