Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] The problems with Boost development
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-20 17:37:07

Next message: Artyom: "[boost] Should Boost adopt pimpl/d-pointer as much as it can?"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] The problems with Boost development"
In reply to: Boris Schaeling: "Re: [boost] The problems with Boost development"
Next in thread: Christopher Jefferson: "Re: [boost] The problems with Boost development"

Boris Schaeling a écrit :
> maybe
> there is a just a simple graphical installation wizard missing - then
> noone would need to care about all those bjam command line options?).

There is already such an installer for Windows provided by BoostPro.

Next message: Artyom: "[boost] Should Boost adopt pimpl/d-pointer as much as it can?"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] The problems with Boost development"
In reply to: Boris Schaeling: "Re: [boost] The problems with Boost development"
Next in thread: Christopher Jefferson: "Re: [boost] The problems with Boost development"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk