|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Should Boost adopt pimpl/d-pointer as much as it can?
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-21 18:54:19
On 21 March 2010 18:37, Emil Dotchevski <emildotchevski_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> This line of thought misses the point of physically decoupling
> implementation details from interfaces. It *is* easier not to do it,
> this doesn't prove that it's better not to do it.
>
But worse is better.
"Just copy the headers" makes replication of the "virus" much easier.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk