Subject: Re: [boost] Should Boost adopt pimpl/d-pointer as much as it can?
From: Josh Faust (jfaust_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-23 13:48:00
> was that an argument?
> if so i say that separating declaration and implementation for non
> template code is a natural practice in C and C++ development
> i.e. declaration -- in headers (*.h), implementation -- in *.cpp or *.c
> personally i like the compile-once-link-any-time-you-want principle
Your comment made it sound like you wanted things to be header-only as much
as possible. Auto-linking is not header only -- it only works on msvc, and
as you said it still requires you to set up your lib paths.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk