Re: [boost] [log] review part 2

Subject: Re: [boost] [log] review part 2
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-24 10:57:12

AMDG

Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 March 2010 18:07:55 Andrey Semashev wrote:
>   
>> On 03/16/2010 01:46 AM, Steven Watanabe wrote:
>>     
>>>>>>> BOOST_LOG_ATTRIBUTE(logging::trivial::severity_level, severity);
>>>>>>> BOOST_LOG_ATTRIBUTE(unsigned int, line_id);
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> I thought if that. It was not done for two reasons:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. The macro would have to have a formatter in its arguments. Given
>>>>>> that the attribute definition should be exposed rather widely, this
>>>>>> additional dependency would be unwelcome.
>>>>>>             
>>> Why is it necessary to pass a formatter to the macro?
>>>       
>> In order to support your syntax:
>>
>>    fmt::stream
>>      << fmt::line_id()
>>      << ": <" << fmt::severity()
>>      << "> " << fmt::message()
>>     
>
> Steven, Andrey,
>
> did you arrive to any decision on the point above?
>   

I think this discussion was continued in another thread,
where it also came up.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe