Re: [boost] Transfer of Maintenance Rights

Subject: Re: [boost] Transfer of Maintenance Rights
From: Jeremiah Willcock (jewillco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-25 13:11:52

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Stewart, Robert wrote:

> Jeremiah Willcock wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Stewart, Robert wrote:
>>> Jeremiah Willcock wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> there are BGL bugs that are kept open (because they
>>>> are legitimate problems) that have too low of a priority to work on
>>>> actively.  If a user submits a patch for them and can test it
>>>> they will be
>>>> fixed.  On the later things in your reply to me, I do like the new
>>>> rewrite.
>>>
>>> Is there a "deferred" state for bugs?  We could explicitly
>>> ignore those in the minimum time to handle statement.
>>
>> I do not see one, but I believe the administrator can add it as a
>> resolution.  There is a setting of "To Be Determined" as a milestone,
>> while is somewhat like "deferred", though.
>
> Hmmm, how about the phrase, "active bugs," like the following?

That term is fine; do you want any sort of explicit definition of what 
bugs count as active?

-- Jeremiah Willcock