Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [GSoC] Some Ideas about the Boost.Process
From: Felipe Tanus (fotanus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-25 17:46:07

Next message: Pete Bartlett: "Re: [boost] [lexical_cast] A non-throwing lexical cast? [Was: 5 Observations - My experience with the boost libraries]"
Previous message: Boris Schaeling: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] Some Ideas about the Boost.Process"
In reply to: Boris Schaeling: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] Some Ideas about the Boost.Process"
Next in thread: Bruno Santos: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] Some Ideas about the Boost.Process"

Hi Boris,

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Boris Schaeling <boris_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> According to MSDN SIGILL, SIGSEGV and SIGTERM are not generated. Thus we
> have support for incredible four signals - not sure if it's worth to create
> a platform independent library because of this. :)
>

Ow, you are right. Without even SIGTERM I guess it's pointless.

[]'s

-- 
Felipe de Oliveira Tanus
E-mail: fotanus_at_[hidden]
Blog: http://www.itlife.com.br
Site: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/~fotanus/
-----
"All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us." - Gandalf

Next message: Pete Bartlett: "Re: [boost] [lexical_cast] A non-throwing lexical cast? [Was: 5 Observations - My experience with the boost libraries]"
Previous message: Boris Schaeling: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] Some Ideas about the Boost.Process"
In reply to: Boris Schaeling: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] Some Ideas about the Boost.Process"
Next in thread: Bruno Santos: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] Some Ideas about the Boost.Process"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk