Subject: Re: [boost] 5 Observations - My experience with the boost libraries
From: Markus Werle (numerical.simulation_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-25 18:53:33
Tom Brinkman wrote:
> 1) Boost uses exceptions.
I am not surprised.
Boost was written in *modern* C++.
Exceptions are such a central concept in modern C++ you cannot really get
Take the chance to get deterministic code using RAII with exceptions and
proper stack unwinding. Something I really like a lot.
Maybe the whole point is not about boost but about modern C++ being disliked
by those who never had the chance to get known to its advantages ...
> As boost libraries tend to throw exceptions, it forces you to put
> try-catch blocks all over your code.
I have a 65000 LOC project (GUI, numerics, 3D plots) where I thought of
exceptions right from the beginning. There are about 15 catch clauses, 2
which I really need, the rest due to compiler issues or lazy quick hacks
Q: What is wrong with try-catch blocks all over your code?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk