Subject: Re: [boost] 5 Observations - My experience with the boost libraries
From: Tom Brinkman (reportbase2007_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-25 20:20:39
All valid points.
These are good points to use when you get some push back to using a
complicate, otherwise hard to explain and understand library.
I just get quiet and shrug my shoulders.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Scott McMurray <me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 23 March 2010 14:11, Tom Brinkman <reportbase2007_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> If it takes more than a day to examine a libraries source code and
>> have some idea what its doing, its very dangerous to use.
> What about, for example, compression or security libs? I don't know
> how libjpeg works. I couldn't explain bz2's text compression scheme.
> I have no interest in the details of H.264 codecs. I can't tell you
> what encryption scheme SSL uses. Does that mean I shouldn't use any
> of them?
> Very often the whole point of using the libraries is that you don't
> know how they do what they do, since you don't want to and shouldn't
> have to.
> I'm really not worried that I would get lost in a chip layout diagram
> for all the hundreds of millions of transistors in my processor.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk