Subject: Re: [boost] Stability: More on 3 level Boost libraries
From: Joel Falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-26 03:02:24
David Bergman wrote:
> Thinking about it a bit more, I would probably prefer a core set, called 'core' for lack of imagination, with a 'general' outshoot, directed at problem solving in any domain, and two other ones, 'sci' and 'other', directed towards specific domains. Yes, 'other' would not be huge...
Another important layer in my eyes (now I'm putting on my user cap), is
that the boost libraries are clearly meant to be either user-land
library (asio, regex, etc) and some are more developer-land library (all
the TMP one for example).
I think this should also appear in the potential subdivisions.