Re: [boost] Transfer of Maintenance Rights

Subject: Re: [boost] Transfer of Maintenance Rights
From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-26 07:27:20

On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 06:50 -0400, Stewart, Robert wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:

[snip]

> My original version only required a Boost-compatible license upon acceptance.  There was concern that perhaps that should be upon submission.  Indeed, Phil Endecott said he wouldn't look at a candidate library otherwise.  I wasn't sure I could or should specify that.  I look forward to hearing from others on that point.  In the meantime, I've reworded that part to indicate the need for that upon submission.

I would prefer to require to use the boost license upon submission. And
not a Boost-compatible license.
Don't we require a boost license already for acceptance?

[snip]

> _____
> Rob Stewart                           robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
> Software Engineer, Core Software      using std::disclaimer;
> Susquehanna International Group, LLP  http://www.sig.com