Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Should Boost adopt pimpl/d-pointer as much as it can?
From: Mika Heiskanen (mika.heiskanen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-26 12:13:47

Next message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] Is there anyone can tell me who is in charge of the Google Summer of Code in boost community for this year"
Previous message: Andrew Sutton: "Re: [boost] GSoC 2010: Heaps and Queues"
In reply to: Artyom: "Re: [boost] Should Boost adopt pimpl/d-pointer as much as it can?"

Artyom wrote:
> Have you tried to distribute a compiled software liked with Boost? It is
> impossible! Because Boost releases new version every few month and they
> are not compatible even at API (not talking about ABI) level.

Using only static boost libraries solves that problem with reasonable
safety whenever you decide to upgrade the boost version you are using.
We actually do not even compile the dynamic libraries to prevent mishaps.

--> Mika Heiskanen

Next message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] Is there anyone can tell me who is in charge of the Google Summer of Code in boost community for this year"
Previous message: Andrew Sutton: "Re: [boost] GSoC 2010: Heaps and Queues"
In reply to: Artyom: "Re: [boost] Should Boost adopt pimpl/d-pointer as much as it can?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk