Re: [boost] New Boost.XInt Library, request preliminary review

Subject: Re: [boost] New Boost.XInt Library, request preliminary review
From: Chad Nelson (chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-28 17:37:36

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>> As described on the rationale page of the documentation, the
>> primary reason I'm using copy-on-write is that move semantics
>> aren't widely available yet. Portability is one of my primary
>> goals, and while I've seen references to a move-semantics-emulator
>> in Boost, I've also seen suggestions that it relies on the compiler
>> to somehow recognize it. That doesn't sound fully portable to me.
> 
> Please could you be more explicit. Do you know some compilers on
> which Boost.Move doesn't works?

As I described later in that branch of the thread, that statement was
based on a comment in the Boost.Thread documentation (which I
misremembered anyway). It didn't refer to the Boost.Move library.
- -- 
Chad Nelson
Oak Circle Software, Inc.
*
*
*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkuvzB8ACgkQp9x9jeZ9/wS+NACeLiYYilXCmglwU7lFRkX48uZf
7tEAnAiho3bkSdryHGTYm1XQhzws+XYc
=xG0m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----