Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [range][string_algo] Conflict between algorithm names
From: Neil Groves (neil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-31 06:14:47

> Boost.Range algorithms are only in the trunk, right? Not yet in any
> numbered
> release?
> Yes I introduced the Boost.RangeEx code merged into Boost.Range on Sunday.
The conflict has been fixed IIRC by Jeremiah by using the Boost.Range
implementations rather than duplicating them.

I am very interested to hear from anyone that has any issues. I have been
reviewing the documentation further and have become aware of a few
documentation typos and omissions which I will submit fixes for this
weekend. I intend to improve compiler compatibility of the Range Adaptor
pipe operator implementations. For now some compilers only work with the
alternative function syntax for some of the adaptors. Also I want to move
all of the pipe operators into the adaptor namespace, currently some are
implemented in range_detail. This doesn't produce any symptoms on modern
compilers as far as I am aware since Argument Dependent Lookup finds the
correct operator.

I would like to hear of any issue with the trunk Boost.Range however small.
I have made considerable effort to preserve backward compatibility, but real
world experience is of course very valuable.

Neil Groves

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at