Re: [boost] Second iteration of Boost.XInt library uploaded, requesting further comments

Subject: Re: [boost] Second iteration of Boost.XInt library uploaded, requesting further comments
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-31 14:26:34

on 31.03.2010 at 22:18
 Steven Watanabe wrote :
> It will not.
>     const size_t        bits_per_digit    = 
> std::numeric_limits<digit_t>::digits;
> is equivalent to
>     static const size_t        bits_per_digit    = 
> std::numeric_limits<digit_t>::digits;

i see
i'm too lazy too consult the standard
but still i think it's a good idea to define compile time constants as
enum members

can you clear this question for me once and forever, Steven? is it
preferable or is it solely a matter of taste?

-- 
Pavel
P.S.
if you notice a grammar mistake or weird phrasing in my message
please point it out