Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [lambda] [result_of] Lambda enhancements
From: OvermindDL1 (overminddl1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-02 21:32:28


On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Daniel Walker <daniel.j.walker_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> and http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/864
>
> This patch seemed to be missing, so I re-uploaded it. The patch was
> the result of (no pun intended) some discussion. I found an e-mail
> with an overview here http://tinyurl.com/2jgtld. To my knowledge, the
> patch was never applied. It's been a few years, but my recollection is
> that a rewrite of lambda was anticipated, which would address these
> issues, and there was little demand for result_of/lambda compatibility
> in the meantime. Also, there was no active maintainer for the lambda
> library.

Actually, Boost.Phoenix I think is what will completely replace
Lambda, have you tried using it, does it have that same problem?


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk