Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [range] Permission to merge to the Release branch
From: Richard Webb (richard.webb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-03 06:52:45


Beman Dawes wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Neil Groves <neil_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>>The regression test results have not detected new
>> regressions, however there are a number of the new features that are not
>> passing unit tests on several compilers. Since the new features would not
>> be
>> usable if I did not merge my opinion is that it is worth merging to allow
>> the use of the newer features on more compliant compilers. In the
>> meantime I
>> can seek to improve the support of adaptors and algorithms on the less
>> capable compilers.
>
>

A few of the new tests are failing on both VC10 and GCC 4.4 in c++0x mode
due to ambiguities between boost::next and std::next, which can be fixed by
qualifying the calls.

I've attached a patch to https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/3593 .

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A--range--Permission-to-merge-to-the-Release-branch-tp28120994p28126187.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk