Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [range] Permission to merge to the Release branch
From: Richard Webb (richard.webb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-03 06:52:45

Beman Dawes wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Neil Groves <neil_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>>The regression test results have not detected new
>> regressions, however there are a number of the new features that are not
>> passing unit tests on several compilers. Since the new features would not
>> be
>> usable if I did not merge my opinion is that it is worth merging to allow
>> the use of the newer features on more compliant compilers. In the
>> meantime I
>> can seek to improve the support of adaptors and algorithms on the less
>> capable compilers.

A few of the new tests are failing on both VC10 and GCC 4.4 in c++0x mode
due to ambiguities between boost::next and std::next, which can be fixed by
qualifying the calls.

I've attached a patch to .

View this message in context:
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at