Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Porting Botan to Boost
From: Sohail Somani (sohail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-07 14:32:46

Next message: Stefan: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] Some new ideas for this year's GSoC"
Previous message: DE: "Re: [boost] New Boost.XInt Library, request preliminary review"
In reply to: Chad Seibert: "[boost] Porting Botan to Boost"

On 07/04/2010 10:26 AM, Chad Seibert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just got confirmation from Jack Lloyd that I can port Botan to Boost. He only uses Boost.Python currently because he was having issues with shared_ptr when compiling for ARM. However, I think that most of these issues will be resolved (or have been) when the porting process takes place. Is there any protocol for porting an entire library to Boost? I know that ASIO took a while for approval.

So I'm going to ask a heretical question: why do you/he want to add it
to Boost?

Please don't make it header only in the process or I will be forced to
look at CryptoPP which is guaranteed to make babies cry.

-- 
Sohail Somani
http://uint32t.blogspot.com

Next message: Stefan: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] Some new ideas for this year's GSoC"
Previous message: DE: "Re: [boost] New Boost.XInt Library, request preliminary review"
In reply to: Chad Seibert: "[boost] Porting Botan to Boost"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk