Re: [boost] xml?

Subject: Re: [boost] xml?
From: Jens Weller (JensWeller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-09 15:41:11

About boost.variant:
boost.variant is not compatible to various other boost libraries, mostly because of conflicts with boost::get. (f.e. graph).

Also the sender offers a library which uses a different approach, maybe worth considering.
And still I think a pluggable solution would be best, where you can choose from different Implementations of Parsers and Datastructures f.e.

regards,

Jens Weller

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:58:07 -0400
> Von: Stefan Seefeld <seefeld_at_[hidden]>
> An: boost_at_[hidden]
> Betreff: Re: [boost] xml?

> On 04/08/2010 01:50 PM, Maarten L. Hekkelman wrote:
> > Op 08-04-10 19:23, Phil Endecott schreef:
> >> So could your XPath implementation be decoupled?  What interface does 
> >> it use to traverse the XML tree?  Could it be used on top of a 
> >> different XML tree implementation, such as a lazy one that stores the 
> >> text of the XML document, if it provided a similar interface?
> > I think most of it should work. However, the entire XPath 
> > specification is build upon the idea that everything is a node and a 
> > node does not have to be an element. That's why I changed my object 
> > hierarchy.
> 
> For the boost.xml library I'm working on I plan to use something akin to 
> boost.variant as the return type of an xpath query. I don't think that 
> the XPath specification should dictate a type hierarchy on a C++ 
> implementation.
> 
> FWIW,
>          Stefan
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
>        ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

-- 
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01