Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Permission to merge Interprocess/Intrusive bugfixes for 1.43 in release branch?
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-14 15:13:27

Next message: Lorenzo Caminiti: "[boost] [contract] importance ordering (was "diff n1962")"
Previous message: Eric Niebler: "Re: [boost] [range] iterator_range::operator[] broken"
In reply to: Ion Gaztañaga: "[boost] Permission to merge Interprocess/Intrusive bugfixes for 1.43 in release branch?"
Next in thread: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] Permission to merge Interprocess/Intrusive bugfixes for 1.43 in release branch?"
Reply: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] Permission to merge Interprocess/Intrusive bugfixes for 1.43 in release branch?"

2010/4/14 Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga_at_[hidden]>:
>
> I know it's a bit late, but I would like to ask if it's possible to merge
> Interprocess/Intrusive bug-fixes from trunk to release. They've been in
> trunk for some weeks and tests are ok.

http://tinyurl.com/y74j439 looks fixable.

Daniel

Next message: Lorenzo Caminiti: "[boost] [contract] importance ordering (was "diff n1962")"
Previous message: Eric Niebler: "Re: [boost] [range] iterator_range::operator[] broken"
In reply to: Ion Gaztañaga: "[boost] Permission to merge Interprocess/Intrusive bugfixes for 1.43 in release branch?"
Next in thread: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] Permission to merge Interprocess/Intrusive bugfixes for 1.43 in release branch?"
Reply: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] Permission to merge Interprocess/Intrusive bugfixes for 1.43 in release branch?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk