Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-03 11:48:55
> Stewart, Robert wrote :
> > Chad Nelson wrote:
> >> If I read your example correctly, then that's about what I
> >> was thinking
> >> of: algorithms that have to start with a copy of one or more of the
> >> passed-in parameters, but then need to modify it/them. The division
> >> algorithm requires this, just as one example off the top
> >> of my head.
> > If your algorithm requires a copy, then COW should make it slower
> > because it will first manipulate the reference count and because you
> > must query in each mutating operation whether to make a unique copy.
> i believe that mutating operations are so expensive that the cow
> overhead becomes negligible
> and one can live with it unless he is very pedantic
Once again, allow me to point out that the copy was being made in order to mutate the copy. The COW operations are superfluous in that case.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.