Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review

Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review
From: Chad Nelson (chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-03 12:03:34

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/03/2010 08:04 AM, Stewart, Robert wrote:

> [...] There may be legitimate reason to use COW in your library, but
> because of the foregoing, you must ensure that you have applied move
> semantics correctly, write the code properly to avoid unnecessary
> copies, and prove that COW remains beneficial in a wide range of use
> cases in a MT test.

That's what I'm trying to do. :-) Though I'm open to alternatives, like
move semantics. I may have identified something that's slowing down the
move implementation in the library, I'll try it today.
- -- 
Chad Nelson
Oak Circle Software, Inc.
*
*
*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkve89YACgkQp9x9jeZ9/wTJzgCgux5pqNe5czQD2tAEgous0DF/
Nn0AoISXjIjw35Qf30mLeF4lqmjvEmzK
=zijU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----