Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Boost.Move vs Copy-on-Write timings
From: Chad Nelson (chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-04 11:41:34
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 05/04/2010 06:16 AM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
>> Exactly what I was saying -- operator+ and operator- are the only ones
>> where it would be likely to save any allocations. The results from
>> operator*, for example, will be larger than the bit-length of the
>> largest parameter.
> I take you don't support in-place expansion then.
> A shame.
I wasn't aware that it was possible to use in-place expansion when
allocating memory via new.
Oak Circle Software, Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk