Re: [boost] [xint] Boost.Move vs Copy-on-Write timings

Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Boost.Move vs Copy-on-Write timings
From: Chad Nelson (chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-04 11:41:34

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/04/2010 06:16 AM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:

>> Exactly what I was saying -- operator+ and operator- are the only ones
>> where it would be likely to save any allocations. The results from
>> operator*, for example, will be larger than the bit-length of the
>> largest parameter.
> 
> I take you don't support in-place expansion then.
> A shame.

I wasn't aware that it was possible to use in-place expansion when
allocating memory via new.
- -- 
Chad Nelson
Oak Circle Software, Inc.
*
*
*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkvgQC4ACgkQp9x9jeZ9/wTr+gCgqw/+/MK+XrC5JQRAkBXV7s/R
gS8AoMKW9VrTYOeC2oAsPfW8ZeYvzfGx
=aiB3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----