Re: [boost] [xint] Unary operator+

Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Unary operator+
From: Chad Nelson (chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-05 16:59:46

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/05/2010 03:40 PM, DE wrote:

>> I was just wishing, when I wrote that, that I did know someone who did
>> that... purely out of curiosity, I wanted to ask why they (i.e. you) did
>> that? Is it just to make it more obvious that it's supposed to be a
>> positive number instead of a negative one?
> 
> i think i expressed my thought incorrectly (or misinterpreted your
> message)
> i meant i'm the person who would expect overloaded unary 'operator+'
> to be out there
> it's natural that it does nothing (i.e. returns unmodified argument)

Darn, and here I thought I'd finally get that burning question answered. ;-)
- -- 
Chad Nelson
Oak Circle Software, Inc.
*
*
*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkvh3D8ACgkQp9x9jeZ9/wR5UQCdFETzpD8uB44cXGPpjvyVoR5f
/LYAnjRyOq4G4EukPJ7CGilfFhdsj3mN
=zMCT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----